ClimateCite

cc

33 Posts

The Climate Brainwashing Of Our Youth

Principia Scientific September 20, 2019 Written by Lynne Balzer CCD Editor’s Note: The following is a second excerpted chapter from Lynne Balzer’s new book, The Green New Deal and Climate Change: What You Need to Know, available from Amazon in paperback and Kindle. You can read her previous chapter here. For approximately forty years the AGW establishment has been indoctrinating the public worldwide, and their media accomplices have been only too willing to cooperate. But nowhere is this more evident than in our public schools. Just as the Nazi’s brainwashed the German children, the global warming movement, which hijacked environmentalism, has unfairly used their captive audiences …

British Columbia Judgment in Mann vs Ball Defamation Suit

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Date: 20190822 Docket: S111913 Registry: Vancouver Between: Michael Mann Plaintiff And: Timothy (“Tim”) Ball Defendants Before: The Honourable Mr. Justice Giaschi Oral Reasons for Judgment In Chambers Counsel for the Plaintiff: R. McConchie Counsel for the Defendant, Timothy (“Tim”) Ball: M. Scherr D. Juteau Place and Date of Hearing: Vancouver, B.C. May 27 and August 22, 2019 Place and Date of Judgment: Vancouver, B.C. August 22, 2019 Download PDF This browser does not support PDFs. Please download the PDF to view it..

Principia Scientific | September 19, 2019 Written by John O’Sullivan The Supreme Court of British Columbia has released the damning official final Judgment in the Mann-v-Ball ‘science trial of the century.’ Honourable Mr Justice Giaschi ruled that Mann’s multi-million-dollar, eight-year libel suit is “dismissed with prejudice” due to Mann’s “inexcusable delay.” (see: Para. 13). The key points from the ruling are cited below: Honourable Mr Justice Giaschi ruled: “There have been two periods, of approximately 35 months in total, where nothing was done. In my view, by any measure, this is an inordinate delay. [8] I now turn to whether …

BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE DR. JUDITH A. CURRY IN SUPPORT OF APPELLANTS’ PETITIONS FOR REHEARING OR REHEARING EN BANC

INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE Dr. Curry is a prominent climate scientist and former longtime chair of the Georgia Institute of Technology’s School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences. Dr. Curry has been a member of the National Research Council’s Climate Research Committee and the United States Department of Energy’s Biological & Environmental Research Advisory Committee. She has authored three books and nearly two hundred scholarly articles on climate science. Dr. Curry also maintains an active blog, Climate Etc., which provides a forum for climate researchers, academics, technical experts from other fields, citizen scientists, and the interested public to engage in a …

Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann Doubling Down After Court Defeat

Principia Scientific Published on September 16, 2019 Written by John O’Sullivan Exactly as we expected, Dr Michael Mann, after his sensational court defeat to Dr Tim Ball in the ‘science trial of the century,‘ doubles down on more shenanigans over his infamous graph. The fundamental principle of jurisprudence is “Put up or shut up!” Mann failed to “put up” and to make matters worse, he fails to “shut up.” In the early hours of this morning mendacious Mann foolishly took to Twitter to try to rally his befuddled and shrinking army of Twitter troops with this latest whopper: Do …

Most Americans say climate change should be addressed now – CBS News poll

CBS September 15, 2019 By Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto A majority of Americans think action needs to be taken right now to address climate change. Most consider it at least to be a serious problem — including more than a quarter who say it is a crisis. Seven in 10 think human activity contributes a lot or some to climate change, and most feel they have a personal responsibility to do something about it, although many say they cannot afford to. Opinions on the subject are marked by partisan divisions. Most – 67% – think humans …

WND By Pat Boone | September 13, 2019 Reader, will you let me take you on a “Back to the Future” trip, layman to layman? On one of the hottest issues of the day? It should let you sleep better at night. What if I can relieve you of ever again worrying about mankind causing “global warming”? My thesis is that only God can do that, governing the sun itself – from which all of the world’s energy comes. So hang on. Almost 100 years ago the Scopes Monkey Trial in Dayton, Tennessee, went into legend as the “trial of …

Why a high-profile climate science opponent quit Trump’s White House

sciencemag.org Scott Waldman, E&E News | Sep. 12, 2019 , 11:05 AM Originally published by E&E News When William Happer realized this summer that his plan to question climate science had been shut down by the White House, he knew he’d stick to his promise: to serve exactly one year in President Donald Trump’s administration and then leave. Happer’s original idea to review climate research involved a team of scientists who would critique government science reports and play up the areas of uncertainty. It would be centered on attacking the National Climate Assessment and potentially be used to mount a …

Michael Mann Retracts False Nobel Prize Claims in Humiliating Climbdown

John OSullivan October 28, 2012 Disgraced Penn State University (PSU) climatologist, Michael Mann, concedes defeat in his bogus claims to be a Nobel Peace Prize winner. Mann’s employer this weekend began the shameful task of divesting itself of all inflated claims on university websites and official documentation that Mann was ever a Peace Prize recipient with Al Gore and the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Thanks to a tip off from respected climate researcher, Dr. Klaus Kaiser, myself and Tom Richard (who scooped the original Nobel story) obtained “before and after” copy images from PSU websites as records of this damning retraction. …

Why Did Michael Mann Lose his Global Warming Lawsuit?

Principia Scientific Published on September 11, 2019 Written by John OSullivan Apologists for discredited ‘climate scientist’ Michael E Mann have been trying to spin his defeat in the ‘science trial of the century’ versus skeptic climatologist, Dr Tim Ball. Among the worst examples includes this weak effort ‘Tim Ball Pleads For Mercy As An Irrelevant Sick Old Man, Gets It, Declares Victory’ which serves only to fool the usual low-information class. Mann’s case was dismissed because he didn’t comply with the rules of discovery – he failed to release the hidden r2 regression numbers demanded by Tim. Failure to comply …

cc