Report 24 18 Oct 2025
While the allegiance of the climate catastrophe continues to report on supposedly melting pole caps, the South Pole is freezing to a cold minimum that has not been measured since 1981. On the 15. October, the Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station registered an incredible minus 61.3 degrees Celsius – in the middle of the Antarctic spring, at a time when it was supposedly going to get warmer long ago.
While politics and the media declare one emergency after another in the continuous frenzy of climate panic, reality once again does not participate. Instead of simply melting away like this, the Amundsen-Scott south pole station reported on 15. October 2025 a temperature of minus 61.3 degrees Celsius. That’s the coldest October level since 1981.
While politicians, climate activists and tax-funded payroll scientists have been instilling in us for years that extreme heat is “the new normal,” the measurement series of the South Pole station show the exact opposite. The trend of recent years is by no means a dramatic melting or heating up of the atmosphere, but rather the exact counter-image of panic propaganda: naturally occurring extreme temperature fluctuations – including striking cold phases, which lead any claim of a linear, CO2-driven climate collapse ad absurdum.
The value of minus 61.3 degrees Celsius was measured in the Antarctic spring, at a time when the sun is already back at the Arctic Circle and the large climate explainer machines from ARD to IPCC otherwise tirelessly report the supposedly “dramatic melting”. And that’s not even all. Already in 2021, even CNN, a loyal drummer in the global climate orchestra, published an interesting report: Antarctica had the coldest winter since records began that year.
There is no linear warming trend
Extreme temperature events like this are not a singular phenomenon, but part of a long-term trend that is systematically concealed in the media. While the narrative of “exploding global warming” dominates the headlines, measuring stations such as Vostok, Dome C or just Amundsen-Scott show again and again clear cold extremes. The reason for this lies in well-researched climatological mechanisms such as stratosphere waves, polar vortex stability and cloud cover. In other words, natural climate influences, not the ideologically inflated trace gas CO2, continue to determine the weather.
Climate models have been wrong regularly for over 30 years. They systematically overestimate temperature development. The IPCC’s forecasts from the 1990s are now only material for cabaret evenings when compared with real-world measurements. Modelers at the time explained that the pole regions would experience the strongest warming. But the South Pole region is defiantly resisting. In some cases, it has even become colder. If climate research were an honest business, one would have to rethink all model assumptions in the event of such deviations.
The new temperature record of Antarctica is another nail in the coffin of the CO2 dogma. Because one thing is certain: If the CO2 was really the dominant climate factor, such a thing should not happen at all. The concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere could be quite higher than in the past centuries. And yet there is no dramatic warming in Antarctica. On the contrary. So what’s wrong? Either the models are wrong or the CO2 theory is incomplete. Both would be fatal for the prevailing climate narrative. Especially for the politicians who destroy entire industries and expropriate populations, because they claim that the majority of the experts would see the “science” and the underlying findings as secure.
