Yes, Prime Minister on Climate Change
Clips from the popular BBC series the New “Yes, Prime Minister”. Global Warming, Parts 1 and 2. Surprising, isn’t it! Global Warming Part 1 Global Warming Part 2
Our mission is to educate the largest number of citizens possible on the fraudulent science, politics, and business of the deceptive carbon dioxide based anthropogenic global warming hypothesis through rigorous scientific experimentation and analysis, and the false viability of “renewable” energy sources; thereby negating the green energy agenda of America’s elected leaders, leading to the removal of carbon dioxide from the U.S. EPA’s 2015 Endangerment Finding and the elimination of all carbon regulation, taxes, and trading worldwide.
Clips from the popular BBC series the New “Yes, Prime Minister”. Global Warming, Parts 1 and 2. Surprising, isn’t it! Global Warming Part 1 Global Warming Part 2
Greenpeace co-founder Patrick Moore gives a keynote address to the Economic Education Association of Alberta’s 6th annual “Freedom School” conference, on “Things that Matter: An Agenda for Alberta”, about changing the world by speaking the truth – in this case about the science, policy and politics of man-made global warming
Joseph Postma Published on Jun 5, 2019 Roy Spencer published an article today stating that I am incorrectly ranting about the fraud of flat Earth theory making its way into modern physics via climate science. I analyze his statement and expose that climate science truly is indeed flat Earth theory: it is baked into the mathematics!
4/24/2019 Earnest C. Watson Lecture by Professor Tapio Schneider, “Clouds and the Climate Tipping Point.” Low clouds over subtropical oceans cool Earth’s climate because they reflect most of the sunlight shining on them back to space. It is unclear, however, how the clouds themselves change with climate; this gives rise to large uncertainties in climate change projections. Tapio Schneider’s lecture will show how advances in computing and satellite observations are enabling breakthroughs in the accuracy of climate projections. Such advances have already revealed a tipping point of the climate system: if greenhouse gas concentrations rise high enough, subtropical low clouds …
Joseph Postma Published on Jun 2, 2019 Did you know that there are two “greenhouse effects”? One is what we find in an actual, real greenhouse and thus actually physically exists and is real. The other is an entirely different scheme invented for Anthropogenic Climate Change pseudoscience and is literally based upon flat Earth theory, and it is NOT found in a real greenhouse, or anywhere else, because it is fake.
Joseph Postma May 31, 2019 We often encounter this back-up argument that the climate physics greenhouse effect “is only a heuristic” and that isn’t the real greenhouse effect of climate physics. I dissect this argument to demonstrate how it proves that advocates of global warming and anthropogenic climate change are actively & purposefully & knowingly engaging in deception.
May 21, 2019 | Association des Climato-réalistes by John Christy, climatologist, professor of atmospheric science at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, a world-renowned specialist in satellite temperature measurements.
Clear Energy Alliance Published on May 9, 2019 You’ve heard the phrase “the Greenhouse Effect” a thousand times, but did you know the term is completely inaccurate when applied to the earth’s atmosphere? The earth’s atmosphere is a non-linear, dynamic system that simultaneously absorbs and emits energy that it receives from the sun. There is no roof on the earth, so the term makes no sense when describing the atmosphere. This incorrect analogy has helped to fuel climate change hysteria. VISIT Clear Energy Alliance https://clearenergyalliance.com/
Professor Murry Salby Helmut Schmidt University Hamburg Germany 10 October 2018
Joseph Postma Streamed live on Jan 10, 2017 PDF: https://climateofsophistry.files.word… In this live webcast I will be giving a slideshow presentation which demonstrates that the radiative greenhouse effect, upon which climate alarm and even the field of climate science itself is based, does not exist. On both scientific requirements of having theoretical & empirical support, the radiative greenhouse effect is proven to have neither: it is based in false physics and paradox, violates the laws of thermodynamics, and doesn’t produce the empirical observables it predicts and claims responsibility for. It isn’t just that climate alarm isn’t as bad as the …