Want an Energy Revolution?

City Journal Mark P. Mills | May 3, 2019 It won’t come from renewables—which can never supply all the power we need—but from foundational scientific discoveries. Throughout history, some 60 percent to 90 percent of every nation’s economy has been consumed by food and fuel costs. Hydrocarbons changed the way that humans organize their productive capacity. The coal age, followed by the oil age, and now by the ascendant age of natural gas, has (at least for developed nations) driven the share of GDP devoted to acquiring food and fuel down to around 10 percent. That transformation constitutes one of …

THE TROPICAL SKIES Falsifying climate alarm

By John Christy The Global Warming Policy Foundation GWPF Note 17 When I grew up, science was defined as a method of discovering information. You would make a claim or a hypothesis, and then you would test that claim against independent data. If it failed, you rejected your claim and you started over again. In other words your hypothesis was not good information. But nowadays, if someone makes a claim about the climate, and someone like me falsifies it, rather than abandoning the hypothesis, that person tends to just yell louder that their claim is right. They find it difficult …

Science’s Untold Scandal: The Lockstep March of Professional Societies to Promote the Climate Change Scare

PJ Media By Tom Harris and Dr. Jay Lehr | May 24, 2019 (Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay) When we started our careers, it was considered an honor to be a member of professional societies that helped practitioners keep up with the latest developments in their fields through relevant meetings and publications. Senior author Dr. Jay Lehr had the privilege of leading one of these societies long ago. But things are different now. Whether it be chemistry, physics, geology or engineering, many of the world’s primary professional societies have changed from being paragons of technical virtue to opportunistic groups …

Whoops! Study shows huge basic errors found in CMIP5 climate models

WUWT March 10, 2015 Incoming solar radiation at the Top of the Atmosphere (TOA) It was just yesterday that we highlighted this unrealistic claim from CMIP5 models: Laughable modeling study claims: in the middle of ‘the pause’, ‘climate is starting to change faster’. Now it seems that there is a major flaw in how the CMIP5 models treat incoming solar radiation, causing up to 30 Watts per square meter of spurious variations. To give you an idea of just how much of an error that is, the radiative forcing claimed to exist from carbon dioxide increases is said to be …

On the incident solar radiation in CMIP5 models

AGU100 Linjiong Zhou, Minghua Zhang, Qing Bao, Yimin Liu First published: 05 March 2015 https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063239 Abstract Annual incident solar radiation at the top of atmosphere should be independent of longitudes. However, in many Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5 (CMIP5) models, we find that the incident radiation exhibited zonal oscillations, with up to 30 W/m2 of spurious variations. This feature can affect the interpretation of regional climate and diurnal variation of CMIP5 results. This oscillation is also found in the Community Earth System Model. We show that this feature is caused by temporal sampling errors in the calculation of the solar …

Confronting the real-life of climate claims

May 21, 2019 | Association des Climato-réalistes by John Christy, climatologist, professor of atmospheric science at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, a world-renowned specialist in satellite temperature measurements.

Greenhouse Deception

Clear Energy Alliance Published on May 9, 2019 You’ve heard the phrase “the Greenhouse Effect” a thousand times, but did you know the term is completely inaccurate when applied to the earth’s atmosphere? The earth’s atmosphere is a non-linear, dynamic system that simultaneously absorbs and emits energy that it receives from the sun. There is no roof on the earth, so the term makes no sense when describing the atmosphere. This incorrect analogy has helped to fuel climate change hysteria. VISIT Clear Energy Alliance https://clearenergyalliance.com/

There is no Radiative Greenhouse Effect – Main Presentation

Joseph Postma Streamed live on Jan 10, 2017 PDF: https://climateofsophistry.files.word… In this live webcast I will be giving a slideshow presentation which demonstrates that the radiative greenhouse effect, upon which climate alarm and even the field of climate science itself is based, does not exist. On both scientific requirements of having theoretical & empirical support, the radiative greenhouse effect is proven to have neither: it is based in false physics and paradox, violates the laws of thermodynamics, and doesn’t produce the empirical observables it predicts and claims responsibility for. It isn’t just that climate alarm isn’t as bad as the …

Letter from Congressmen Objecting to President’s Climate Committee

Letter dated Feb. 18, 2019 to President Trump, from Adam Smith, Frank Pallone, Raul Grijalva and Eddie Bernice Johnson. We are deeply concerned about recent reports that the National Security Council (NSC) is planning to assemble a secret panel, led by a discredited climate change denier, to undermine the overwhelming scientific consensus on the nature and threats of climate change, including to the national security of the United States. … Download PDF This browser does not support PDFs. Please download the PDF to view it.. [pdf-embedder url=”https://climatecite.com/wp-content/uploads/letter-Secret-Climate-Panel.pdf”]