ClimateCite

OVEREXPOSED

Gobal Witness HOW THE IPCC’S 1.5°C REPORT DEMONSTRATES THE RISKS OF OVER INVESTMENT IN OIL AND GAS 23 APRIL 2019 Overinvestment in oil and gas creates risks for investors, regardless of whether the world is effective in tackling climate change. Either investors face assets being stranded as demand for fossil fuels falls in a transition to a low carbon economy, or the overinvestment contributes to excess emissions from fossil fuels, the failure to transition and the financial costs of a dramatically changed climate. Our analysis compared average oil and gas demand in the IPCC scenarios that are not reliant on …

Dr. Shaviv – What about the 97% consensus?

Dr. Nir Shaviv, astrophysicist, explains that science is about evidence, not consensus, and how the IPCC’s predictions on global warming do not reflect the evidence. This is due to the sun’s direct and indirect effects on climate not being fully accounted for.

Letter to EPA from Congress on Proposed EPA Endangerment Finding

July 16, 2009 Second (and first) letter from the Congressional Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations to Lisa Jackson of the EPA questioning the proposed EPA climate endangerment report and the exclusion of Dr. Alan Carlin from the preparation of the report.

PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF “ENDANGERMENT AND CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTE FINDINGS FOR GREENHOUSE GASES UNDER SECTION 202(a) OF THE CLEAN AIR ACT”

BEFORE THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY In re: Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases Under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act EPA Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0171 PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF“ENDANGERMENT AND CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTE FINDINGS FOR GREENHOUSE GASES UNDER SECTION 202(a) OF THE CLEAN AIR ACT”

An Exchange on Climate Science and Alarm

By Richard S. Lindzen March 2, 2008 Introduction On October 21-22, 2005, the Yale Center for Globalization held a conference on “Global Climate Policy After 2012″. Speakers holding a variety of views addressed the conference, but, as usual, there was little time for actual debate. It was understood that the papers presented at the conference would be published, but, for reasons that I am not privy to, the publication was delayed for over two years. During this interval, papers were, apparently modified, and, in particular, the paper by Rahmstorf was turned into a specific attack on my paper. This would …

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF CLIMATOLOGISTS AND SCIENTISTS

No. 05-1120 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS , et al., Petitioners, v. U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY , et al., Respondents. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF CLIMATOLOGISTS AND SCIENTISTS SALLIE BALIUNAS, JOHN R. CHRISTY, CHRIS DE FREITAS, DAVID LEGATES, ANTHONY LUPO, PATRICK MICHAELS, JOEL SCHWARTZ, AND ROY W. SPENCER IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF CLIMATOLOGISTS AND SCIENTISTS SALLIE BALIUNAS, JOHN R. CHRISTY, CHRIS DE FREITAS, DAVID LEGATES, ANTHONY LUPO, PATRICK MICHAELS, JOEL SCHWARTZ, AND ROY W. …

CO2: The Greatest Scientific Scandal of our Time

by Zbigniew Jaworowski, M.D., Ph.D., D.Sc. On Feb. 2, 2007, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) again uttered its mantra of catastrophe about man-made global warming. After weeks of noisy propaganda,for Policymakers” of the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, 2007, was presented in grandiose style in Paris to a crowd of politicians and media, accompanied by a blackout of the Eiffel Tower to show that electric energy is bad. The event induced a tsunami of hysteria that ran around the world. This was probably the main aim of this clearly political paper, prepared by governmental and United Nations bureaucrats, and …

DeSmogBlog: Criminal Enemies of Science

<a href=”https://principia-scientific.org/desmogblog-criminal-enemies-of-science/”>Principia Scientific</a> John O’Sullivan | April 25, 2019 Anyone who searches for ‘Principia Scientific International’ on a major corporate search engine may be bemused to see the criminally-run hate site, desmogblog tagged beside us, posting a smear of our organisation. Clearly, the search engines themselves are indifferent (or supportive) towards these politicized merchants of disinformation. For those readers unfamiliar with desmogblog we invite you to peruse the following facts.

Critical Thinking Climate Change

Joseph Postma In this video I discuss how if we simply apply the merest degree of critical thinking to climate alarm/change science, we can prove that it has no valid foundations or conclusions whatsoever. Everything that climate change alarm science predicts and interprets is filtered through their “reducing goggles” of, yes, flat Earth theory.

Cooling Down the Hysteria About Global Warming

Rich Enthoven | April 21, 2019 Recently, NASA released its annual report on global temperatures and reported that 2018 was the fourth hottest year on record, surpassed only by three recent years. This claim was accompanied by dire predictions of climate change and for immediate action to dramatically curtail CO2 emissions around the globe. Like every concerned citizen read this report with interest. I also read it as an informed and trained climate analyst – and I can tell that there are some serious problems with the report and its conclusions.