Our mission is to educate the largest number of citizens possible on the fraudulent science, politics, and business of the deceptive carbon dioxide based anthropogenic global warming hypothesis through rigorous scientific experimentation and analysis, and the false viability of “renewable” energy sources; thereby negating the green energy agenda of America’s elected leaders, leading to the removal of carbon dioxide from the U.S. EPA’s 2015 Endangerment Finding and the elimination of all carbon regulation, taxes, and trading worldwide.
Shale Magazine featured the ClimateCite article “Where does Energy on our Planet Come From” in their Jan/Feb 2021 issue. Download PDF This browser does not support PDFs. Please download the PDF to view it.
Shale Magazine By: Tom D. Tamarkin & Foster Friess December 19, 2020 In March 2019, House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi unveiled the Climate Action Now Act which was a bill that essentially forbids the US withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accords. At the same time Senate Minority Leader, Chuck Schumer announced a new Democratic committee on climate change that would give the Senate a larger climate change forum. The House bill passed the House but not the Senate and the Senate climate change committee went nowhere. Under President Donald Trump’s order, the US filed its intent to withdraw from …
G.V. Chilingar, et al., adapted from “The Evolution of the Earth’s Climate”, 2018, Scrivener Publishing, John Wiley & Sons This book is dedicated to those politicians interested in the truth, basing their opinions on scientific facts, rather than emotions, personal profit, or conformity. An excellent example of this is the United States President, Donald J. Trump. Dedications & Contents Introduction & Acknowlegments Chapter 1: Climatic Paradox Chapter 2: A Description of the Adiabatic Process Chapter 3: The Earth’s Synoptic Activities Chapter 4: Development of Earth’s Hydrosphere Chapter 5: Earth’s Historic Atmospheres Chapter 6: Nitrogen in Earth’s Atmosphere Chapter 7: Development …
For Immediate Release Contact: ClimateCite Corp Phone: +1-916-482-2000 Email: tt@climatecite.com Photograph, left to right, Dr. Leonid Khilyuk, Dr. Mark Chilingar, Dr, George Chilingar, Pat Boone, Tom Tamarkin, and Ph.D. Candidate, Nasrin Mohammadi PDF George V. Chilingar has accepted the position of Chief Science Officer in our ClimateCite nonprofit company dedicated to educating policy makers, elected leaders, the media, and the public on the real science concerning climate change and the massive deception and fraud known as AGW or anthropogenic global warming/climate change. Dr. Chilingar, as Professor Emeritus of Petroleum and Environmental Engineering, University of Southern California (USC), taught at USC …
EnergyCite’s mission is to kill this mammoth beast called the climate change hoax and to expose those who have perpetrated this fraud and unduly profited from it. Join with us as we produce the Mango Project. Download PDF This browser does not support PDFs. Please download the PDF to view it..
Exclusive: Pat Boone offers Part 3 in his series on discredting of ‘hockey stick’ scientist By Pat Boone October 30, 2019 Gentle reader – and fellow taxpayer – let us again examine an important and unfolding story of global climate science fraud unreported by “fake news,” or to put it more tactfully, inaccurate, biased and selective mainstream media. The recent Mann v. Ball lawsuit verdict, dubbed the “science trial of the century,” has repercussions so profound it has spurred me to write this series of articles (this is the third, if you’re counting). Please pay attention – or you’ll feel …
Bud Bromley October 12, 2019 More than 10 years ago, Dr. Roy Spencer explained (1) in detail with examples why the climate models are wrong. All models were overstating climate sensitivity to greenhouse gases. The models were all (at the time) too sensitive to radiative forcing because they had misunderstood feedback processes, that is, feedback is an effect of radiative forcing, not a cause. His blockbuster revelation was that ALL feedback from radiative emissions from greenhouse gases is negative. This note confirms Dr. Spencer’s conclusion at the molecular level. In the troposphere, the layer of air closest to earth’s surface, …
Principia Scientific Published on August 27, 2019 Written by Tom D. Tamarkin Why Big Green energy investors rely on the man-made global warming myth Supposedly “green” or “renewable” energy has become a trillion-dollar-plus annual industry that has spawned tens of thousands of new businesses worldwide. The total Climate-Industrial Complex is a $2-trillion-per-year business. Major fossil fuel companies like Shell Energy now have green energy divisions. These companies are virtually 100% dependent on the politically driven notion of “dangerous manmade global warming and climate change.” The media, public and political establishment constantly recite the assertion that 97% of scientists say the …
G. V. CHILINGAR, L. F. KHILYUK, and O. G. SOROKHTIN Introduction Traditional anthropogenic theory of currently observed global warming states that release of carbon dioxide into atmosphere (partially as a result of utilization of fossil fuels) leads to an increase in atmospheric temperature because the molecules of CO2 (and other greenhouse gases) absorb the infrared radiation from the Earth’s surface. This statement is based on the Arrhenius hypothesis, which was never verified (Arrhenius, 1896). The proponents of this theory take into consideration only one component of heat transfer in atmosphere, i.e., radiation. Yet, in the dense Earth’s troposphere with the …
Principia Scientific Published on August 13, 2019 Written by Bud Bromley & Tom D. Tamarkin Abstract: Carbon dioxide is the “gas of life” providing the carbon on which all plant and animal life on earth is based. The IPCC and the anthropogenic climate change community have asserted that carbon dioxide or CO2 is a pollutant because it enables global warming or climate change. Computer models have been generated based on the unproven “Radiated Greenhouse Gas Emissions” theory which predicts catastrophic changes in the Earth’s climate leading to much future death and destruction. No demonstrable, empirical evidence of this theory …