All posts in Articles

By Luis R. Miranda  The Real Agenda News April 11, 2014 BRAZIL    Back in 2008, a report titled   Nature, Not Human Activity, Controls the Climate was  published by the Non-governmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC). The report was an analysis of peer-reviewed papers and other published literature which purportedly studied climate change and how humanity contributed to the phenomenon. A total of 24 independent scientists participated in the review, which resulted in a 50 page document on the causes and consequences of climate change. This study was different because it included papers that the IPCC ignored and also because it …

Answer by: James Matkin , LAWYER WRITER (2006-present) Yes, climate change by man is an imagined unproven problem. Sea levels are not rising, islands are not sinking, some glaciers expand as others melt, polar bears flourish, winters are colder with massive snowfall and the ski business is booming. Alarmist computer projections of catastrophic warming all fail. Where is the problem? Humans are a tropical species and most prosperous during warm interglatial period. We certainly do not need a colder climate. Download the PDF This browser does not support PDFs. Please download the PDF to view it..

Principia Scientific Aug. 5, 2019 Written by Sanjeev Sabhlok As a rule of thumb, 80 percent of policy development should be about understanding the problem. Once a problem is understood, the solution generally presents itself.  But in the case of climate change, policymakers have bypassed this step and are insisting on “fixing” the “problem.” They forget that the IPCC’s own reports show that there is no problem. Even in its extreme scenario (highly speculative), the worst that could happen is that our much richer future generations will become two percent less rich. But the IPCC fails to emphasize that without …

Principia Scientific July 30, 2019 Written by Dr Tim Ball (Climatologist) The consistent pattern of the IPCC reveals demonization and misrepresentations of CO2. Here are some basic facts about CO2 that illustrate the discrepancy between what the IPCC claim and what science knows. Natural levels of Carbon dioxide (CO2) are less than 0.04% of the total atmosphere; it is far from being the most important or even only greenhouse gas as most of the public understands. Water vapour which is 95 percent of the greenhouse gases by volume is by far the most abundant and important greenhouse gas. The other …

By Jamal Munshi, April 28, 2019   FIGURE 1: 13C MEASURING STATIONS USED IN THIS STUDY   FIGURE 2: CORRELATION ANALYSIS: BARROW ALASKA   FIGURE 3: CORRELATION ANALYSIS: SOUTH POLE   FIGURE 4: CORRELATION ANALYSIS: CAPE KUMUKAHI   FIGURE 5: CORRELATION ANALYSIS: LA JOLLA   FIGURE 6: CORRELATION ANALYSIS: CHRISTMAS ISLAND   FIGURE 7: CORRELATION ANALYSIS: ALERT, CANADA Fossil fuel reservoirs deep under the ground contain a large inventory of carbon that has been sequestered for millions of years from the delicately balanced surface-atmosphere carbon cycle that sustains a stable climate system and life on earth as we know it. …

By Tom V. Segalstad Former IPCC Expert Reviewer Download the PDF Download the Power Point

Principia Scientific By John O’Sullivan | July 22, 2019 Australian mathematician proves that the  ’33 degrees Greenhouse Effect’ in mainstream climate theory is not a property of the atmosphere but a measure of the bias inherent in the standard academic model of Earth. Bevan Dockery B.Sc.(Hons – Mathematics) has just published a new analysis (CO2_vs_temp_2018_paper_2) further undermining the credibility of the so-called ‘greenhouse gas effect’ theory which is the cornerstone of man-made global warming alarmism. The paper is reproduced below in full: Temperature and CO2 concentration Here is 39 years of empirical data, showing a distinct lack of a relationship …

CFACT Joe Bastardi |July 17th, 2019 Mashable reported that “June was the warmest June ever recorded.”  This is a classic example of hysterical climate propaganda. First of all, I am grateful for articles such as this, for it provides an opportunity to showcae the other side of the argument. One is never going to convince agenda driven zealots bent on destroying anyone in their way of ones point, However for those curious enough to look you may be able to see why there is skepticism over the issue of co2 now being the climate control knob And of course the …

WUWT By Allan M.R. MacRae, B.A.Sc., M.Eng. July 20, 2019 On July 4, 2019, I published the article “THE COST TO SOCIETY OF RADICAL ENVIRONMENTALISM”. There was a reason why this article was published on July 4. My article begins: Ever wonder why extremists attack honest scientists who oppose global warming and climate change hysteria? Ever wonder why climate extremists refuse to debate the science? IT IS BECAUSE GLOBAL WARMING AND CLIMATE CHANGE ALARMISM WAS NEVER ABOUT THE SCIENCE – IT WAS ALWAYS A FALSE NARRATIVE, A SMOKESCREEN FOR THE TOTALITARIAN OBJECTIVES OF THE EXTREME LEFT.