Global Warming: Fact or Fiction? Featuring Physicists Willie Soon and Elliott Bloom

Independent Institute Published on Aug 16, 2019 Is global warming real? Have any such predictions been established scientifically? Would massive “carbon” taxes and other controls put America and the world—especially the poor—at great risk? At this special event, geoscientist and astrophysicist Willie Soon separates fact from fiction in the global warming debate. He explains why the forecasts from CO2 climate models have been so wrong—and why solar influences on clouds, oceans, and wind drive climate change, not CO2 emissions. Stanford University physicist Elliott Bloom then comments. “The whole point of science is to question accepted dogmas. For that reason, I …

Unstoppable Solar Cycles – Full Video

When Erik the Red first arrived in Greenland, the fertile green land was perfect for farming. But within a few centuries the thriving Viking settlements had been wiped out by global cooling. The Little Ice Age is one of many climactic eras that have been scientifically identified. Since about 1850 the earth has been in a warming period. What is the role of carbon dioxide in warming? The best available records of temperature and atmospheric CO2 over the past 650,000 years indicate that the earth’s temperature always rises first, followed by a rise in carbon dioxide. If a warmer earth …

Cooling of Atmosphere Due to CO2 Emission

Cooling of Atmosphere Due to CO2 Emission

G. V. CHILINGAR, L. F. KHILYUK, and O. G. SOROKHTIN Introduction Traditional anthropogenic theory of currently observed global warming states that release of carbon dioxide into atmosphere (partially as a result of utilization of fossil fuels) leads to an increase in atmospheric temperature because the molecules of CO2 (and other greenhouse gases) absorb the infrared radiation from the Earth’s surface. This statement is based on the Arrhenius hypothesis, which was never verified (Arrhenius, 1896). The proponents of this theory take into consideration only one component of heat transfer in atmosphere, i.e., radiation. Yet, in the dense Earth’s troposphere with the …

How to Destroy the Climate Change Hoax

Celebrities, activists, environmentalist organizations, the UN, government entities and sadly, even the Vatican support the theory that humans cause climate change. However, in this exclusive interview, “global warming” expert and author Marc Morano gives you hard-hitting arguments and facts that dispel the artificial fear propagated by “climate emergency” alarmists. The global warming alarmists and their community are acting on a false premise. They are presenting to people who have been indoctrinated in the false and incorrectly named theory that “greenhouse gases” contribute a statistically relevant amount of warming. It is obvious that they do not understand the natural carbon cycle …

All the biggest lies about climate change DEBUNKED in one astonishing interview

CLIMATE CORRUPTION SPURS A FAKE GLOBAL WARMING CRISIS USING MISTRUTHS AND BAD MODELLING. THE FALSE CLIMATE CRISIS IS PROMOTED BY THE UN, LEFTY POLITICIANS, BIG ANTI-BUSINESS MEDIA AND COMPLIANT SCIENTISTS. THE PUBLIC ARE IN THE GRIP OF GROUP THINK NOW AND SEE ANY WEATHER DISTURBANCES AS PROOF OF THE FALSE MEME THAT HUMAN CARBON DIOXIDE FALSELY CALLED CARBON POLLUTION IS THE CULPRIT. TEMPERATURES DATA IS FUDGED TO OVERCOME CONTRADICTIONS FROM REALITY, LIKE GLACIER MELT AND SEA RISE. SNOWFALL PREDICITONS ARE NOW IGNORED WHEN THE FAILED TO BE MODERATE. DROUGHT IS IN DECLINE AND RAINFALL AND FLOODS ARE INCREASING. THE EARTH IS COOLING NOT WARMING TOO MUCH.

THE FOLLOWING INTERVIEW BY LATE BELGIAN CLIMATE SCIENTIST ISTVAN MARKO SUMMARIZES AND REBUTS THE CLIAMTE LIES.

97% Consensus is false propaganda – Scientists for 100 years, can’t decide between warming or new ice age?

They say there is a 97% consensus on climate change. What is the consensus, exactly? Answer by James Matkin, former Director at Bank of Canada (1992-1995) Updated Jan 24 Bunk. There is no such consensus. In fact there was a serious divide between the IPCC scientists and the UN on the science of human caused climate change. The UN played the scientists for fools! The 97% derives from a survey sent to 10,257 people of which the 3,146 respondents were further whittled down to 77 self selected climate “scientists “ of which 75 were judged to agree that human induced …

Climatic Effects of Manmade Carbon Dioxide

Principia Scientific Published on August 13, 2019 Written by Bud Bromley & Tom D. Tamarkin Abstract: Carbon dioxide is the “gas of life” providing the carbon on which all plant and animal life on earth is based. The IPCC and the anthropogenic climate change community have asserted that carbon dioxide or CO2 is a pollutant because it enables global warming or climate change.   Computer models have been generated based on the unproven “Radiated Greenhouse Gas Emissions” theory which predicts catastrophic changes in the Earth’s climate leading to much future death and destruction. No demonstrable, empirical evidence of this theory …

Is the airborne fraction of anthropogenic CO 2 emissions increasing?

Wolfgang Knorr Received 18 August 2009; revised 21 September 2009; accepted 23 September 2009; published 7 November 2009. [ 1 ] Several recent studies have highlighted the possibility that the oceans and terrestrial ecosystems have started loosing part of their ability to sequester a large proportion of the anthropogenic CO2 emissions. This is an important claim, because so far only about 40% of those emissions have stayed in the atmosphere, which has prevented additional climate change. This study re-examines the available atmospheric CO2 and emissions data including their uncertainties. It is shown that with those uncertainties, the trend in the …

Climate change caused by “dominant” Natural Causes, not Humans

By Luis R. Miranda  The Real Agenda News April 11, 2014 BRAZIL    Back in 2008, a report titled   Nature, Not Human Activity, Controls the Climate was  published by the Non-governmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC). The report was an analysis of peer-reviewed papers and other published literature which purportedly studied climate change and how humanity contributed to the phenomenon. A total of 24 independent scientists participated in the review, which resulted in a 50 page document on the causes and consequences of climate change. This study was different because it included papers that the IPCC ignored and also because it …